↳ Back to Blog
Machine Comparison· 10 Jun 2026· 7 min read

Hinowa vs. CMC vs. Teupen: Which Spider Lift is Right for Your Site?

If you are looking to hire a tracked access platform in the UK, you will almost certainly end up with a machine built by either Teupen, Hinowa, or CMC. These three European manufacturers dominate the rental fleets, and for good reason—they make outstanding, highly engineered kit.

However, each brand has its own design philosophy, strengths, and weaknesses. Choosing the wrong one can make your job unnecessarily difficult. Let's break down what makes each brand unique and where they excel.

Teupen: The High-Reach Pioneers

Teupen (manufactured in Germany) is the original inventor of the modern spider lift. If you are working at heights above 24 meters—and all the way up to 40 meters—Teupen is the industry benchmark. Their Leo series machines are built like tanks.

  • Best for: High-rise building maintenance, complex steel installations, and heavy-duty industrial sites.
  • Strengths: Incredible rigidity at height, highly sophisticated control screens, and excellent stabilization on steep slopes.
  • Weaknesses: Can be wider and heavier than Italian alternatives at lower working heights, making transport more expensive.

Hinowa: The Outreach and Ease-of-Use King

Hinowa (manufactured in Italy) is the absolute favorite for heights between 15m and 23m. Their LightLift series is the backbone of most UK rental fleets. If you talk to hire desks or hire operators, they love Hinowas because they are exceptionally user-friendly.

  • Best for: Tree surgery, facilities management, glazing replacement, and general construction.
  • Strengths: One-button automatic outrigger setup, extremely smooth proportional controls, and class-leading unrestricted outreach with full basket weight.
  • Weaknesses: Outrigger footprint can be relatively wide compared to some ultra-narrow CMC models.

CMC: The High Reach-to-Weight Specialists

CMC (manufactured in Italy) has grown rapidly in the UK. They focus heavily on maximizing reach while keeping the machine's overall weight and size to an absolute minimum. They use double-pantograph boom geometries which allow for "up-and-over" clearance that telescope-only booms struggle to match.

  • Best for: Residential access, tight indoor spaces, and historic property renovation.
  • Strengths: Excellent up-and-over reach, narrow outrigger setup configurations, and lightweight build relative to working height.
  • Weaknesses: Boom can feel slightly more flexible/elastic at maximum outreach compared to a rigid Teupen.

Direct Comparison at 20 Meters

To make this practical, let's look at three popular 20-meter models side-by-side. Notice the trade-offs between weight, width, and outreach:

MetricHinowa LL 20.10CMC S20Teupen Leo 21GT
Working Height20.15m19.90m21.00m
Max Outreach9.70m9.00m12.00m
Stowed Width0.79m0.78m0.98m
Total Weight2,840kg2,980kg3,000kg
Outrigger Setup Area2.92m x 2.92m2.90m x 2.90m3.75m x 3.75m

Summary: Which Should You Hire?

Hire a **Hinowa** if you want a reliable, easy-to-use machine for standard heights where outreach and smooth controls are critical. Hire a **CMC** if you are dealing with very tight gates and need to reach up and over low roofs. Hire a **Teupen** if you need massive working heights or a rock-solid platform for heavy construction work.

Compare All Specs on MewpHub

I co-created MewpHub specifically to compare specs like these instantly. If you need assistance choosing, connect with me on LinkedIn and drop a message.

Connect on LinkedIn →
MD

Matt Dean

Technical Field Sales Specialist & Co-Founder of MewpHub

Matt Dean is a UK powered access specialist with 16 years of experience, specializing in spider lifts (tracked access platforms). He co-founded MewpHub and works directly with contractors, tree surgeons, and facilities managers nationally to supply operated and self-drive access solutions.